Critical Thinking and Problem Solving

Identifies Consequences and Evaluates Responses to Situations
Download

VOISS Connection

During VOISS lessons, Todd learned to pause for five seconds when presented with a new situation. This allowed him to consider the impact of his behavior on others and to choose an appropriate action. Todd consistently applied this skill in VOISS lessons, but Mr. Zamarrón wanted to make sure that Todd responded appropriately during novel situations at school. 

Mr. Zamarrón created a lesson to help Todd practice the skills of identifying consequences (Critical Thinking & Problem Solving Skill 6) and evaluating responses to a situation (Critical Thinking & Problem Solving Skill 5).

VOISS Advisor Lesson Plan Outline

Critical Thinking & Problem Solving Skill 6: Identifies Consequences

Critical Thinking & Problem Solving Skill 5: Evaluates Responses to Situation

Define the social skill to be demonstrated in observable and measurable terms. This should be the skill you want the student to use when the situation / opportunity naturally occurs.

When presented with a new / unfamiliar situation at school, Todd will follow classroom rules / group expectations for 10/10 situations.

When an adult asks Todd to explain his actions following a new / unfamiliar situation, Todd will explain why he chose his course of action for 9/10 situations.

Generalization Emphasis

Setting Generalization

Instructional Setting

Instructional Method

Support Strategy

Reinforcement

Generalizing the Skills

Because he wanted Todd to respond appropriately across new situations / settings, Mr. Zamarrón focused on response generalization. He operationally defined two objectives to determine the generalization lesson had been effective:

  • When presented with a new / unfamiliar situation at school, Todd will follow classroom rules / group expectations for 10/10 situations.
  • When an adult asks Todd to explain his actions following a new / unfamiliar situation, Todd will explain why he chose his course of action for 9/10 situations.

Choosing an Instructional Setting and Method

Having defined his objective, Mr. Zamarrón needed to determine an instructional setting and method. During VOISS training, he learned that role play was an evidence-based practice for teaching social skills to small groups of learners. He decided that role play would be ideal for teaching the targeted skills because he could emulate real-world scenarios. Mr. Zamarrón also recalled that Todd attended a biweekly lunch bunch with peers with and without disabilities. The lunch bunch was a small group designed for social skills instruction, and Mr. Zamarrón and Todd’s speech-language pathologist, Ms. Forbes, facilitated the group. He would use this lunch bunch for his instruction.

Choosing a Generalization Tactic and Support Strategy

With his setting and instructional method in mind, Mr. Zamarrón began contemplating his generalization tactic and support strategy. He knew that he could not predict every novel situation Todd might encounter, and he wanted to prepare Todd for a variety of situations. Thus, Mr. Zamarrón decided to teach multiple examples to prepare Todd for a range of possible situations. Because one of his instructional objectives involved interactions with adults, Mr. Zamarrón decided he would use Todd’s token reinforcement system to support the skill. Each time an adult observed Todd behaving appropriately in a new situation and Todd explained why he behaved in that way, the adult would give Todd a token. Mr. Zamarrón would meet with each of Todd’s teachers after the lesson to explain the reinforcement system and to train them to prompt and reinforce the targeted skills.

Lesson Implementation

Mr. Zamarrón’s Lesson on “Identifying Consequences and Evaluating Responses to a Situation”

 

Preparing the Role Play

Mr. Zamarrón decided to script some of his instructional delivery prior to the lesson. He recalled that role play involved short scenarios with defined roles and scripts for each player, much like a short play. In order to teach multiple examples, Mr. Zamarrón wrote out 10 short scenarios involving a novel situation. Each scenario had four roles, with a defined role for Todd. Each script also included a role for the teacher, and the peers alternated playing this role. The scenarios focused on teaching Todd to pause when encountering a novel situation and consider the appropriate course of action by observing his peers, listening to his teacher, and following classroom rules. 

Mr. Zamarrón planned to have four students (including Todd) join in the small group instruction. He began the lesson by describing to the students what the role play entailed. He explained that sometimes we encounter new / challenging situations, and it is difficult to determine how to behave. He told the students that they would know what to do by following classroom rules (e.g., staying in line), listening to the teacher (e.g., staying quiet, waiting for directions), and watching their peers (e.g., if all of the class is seated quietly, it’s inappropriate to run across the hallway). 

The group practiced each role play two times. In each role play, Mr. Zamarrón prompted Todd to pause, and Mr. Zamarrón named the clues he would use to determine the appropriate action. For example, in a scenario where a classmate had a medical emergency, Mr. Zamarrón reminded Todd, “Your peers are all staying at their desks, waiting for the teacher to tell them what to do. Although there isn’t a classroom rule for how to act when a student is hurt, you should stay in your chair and wait for your teacher to tell you what to do. Getting up to talk to your friends could make it harder for your teacher to help the student experiencing the medical emergency.”

After each role play, Mr. Zamarrón asked the group to describe how they knew Todd took the appropriate course of action. He also described an alternative course of action and asked students to describe the consequences of that action.

After the lesson, Mr. Zamarrón led a brief discussion with Todd and his peers. He asked the students to describe other unusual situations that might occur, how they should behave, and the consequences of appropriate and inappropriate responses to these new situations.

Reinforcing the Skills

Mr. Zamarrón also briefly met with Todd’s teachers after school to train them to prompt and reinforce Todd. He described what Todd had learned and shared his token reinforcement system. He recognized that they could not provide reinforcement during or immediately after a novel situation. However, he encouraged them to speak to Todd when the situation had been resolved. He trained Todd’s teachers to describe Todd’s behavior and the situation (e.g., “There was a fire drill and you stayed with the class and followed directions”) and to ask Todd to explain why he knew to behave that way. When Todd performed both instructional targets correctly, his teachers could give him a token and provide descriptive praise (e.g., “You stayed calm and helped us safely and quickly exit the building”). When Todd collected five tokens, he would choose an option from his reinforcement menu, a collection of preferred activities and items. 

 

NATIONAL AND STATE STANDARDS BENCHMARKS AND INDICATORS

CTPS.5 EVALUATES RESPONSE TO SITUATION
COLLABORATIVE FOR ACADEMIC, SOCIAL AND EMOTIONAL LEARNING (CASEL) STANDARDS
  • Social-Awareness
  • Responsible Decision Making
KANSAS SOCIAL EMOTINAL CHARACTER DEVELOPMENT (KSECD) STANDARDS

Character Development

  • Core Principles
    • B. Develop, implement, promote, and model core ethical and performance principles.
      • 6-8 (11-13) 4. Practice and receive feedback on responsible actions including academic and behavioral skills.
  • Responsible Decision Making and Problem Solving
    • B. Develop, implement, and model effective problem solving skills.
      • 6-8 (11-13) 3. Identify desired outcome and discuss if it is attainable.
      • 5. Identify best solution and analyze if it is likely to work.
      • 6. Generate a plan for carrying out the chosen option.
      • 7. Evaluate the effects of the solution.
CTPS.6 IDENTIFIES CONSEQUENCES
COLLABORATIVE FOR ACADEMIC, SOCIAL AND EMOTIONAL LEARNING (CASEL) STANDARDS
  • Responsible Decision Making
  • Self-Management
KANSAS SOCIAL EMOTINAL CHARACTER DEVELOPMENT (KSECD) STANDARDS

Character Development

  • Responsible Decision Making and Problem Solving
    • A. Develop, implement, and model responsibe decision making skills. 3. Play a developmentally appropriate role in classroom management and school governance.
      • 6-8 (11-13) a. Construct and model classroom expectations and routines.
  • Core Principles
    • B. Develop, implement, promote, and model core ethical and performance principles.
      • 6-8 (11-13) 3. Create clear and consistent expectations of good character throughout all school activities and in all areas of the school.