VOISS Connection
Specifically, he learned to identify rules that are okay to break in unusual circumstances, especially when a trusted adult says it’s okay.
Mr. Zamarrón created a lesson to help Todd practice the skills of knowing when a rule doesn’t work (Critical Thinking & Problem Solving Skill 8) and knowing when to change strategies (Critical Thinking & Problem Solving Skill 7).
VOISS Advisor Lesson Plan Outline
Critical Thinking & Problem Solving Skill 8: Knows When a Rule Doesn’t Work
Critical Thinking & Problem Solving Skill 7: Knows When to Change Strategies
Define the social skill to be demonstrated in observable and measurable terms. This should be the skill you want the student to use when the situation / opportunity naturally occurs.
When a parent or teacher tells Todd to break one of 10 pre-taught rules, Todd will follow the adult’s direction and complete the rule-specific task at a later time on 9/10 opportunities.
Generalization Emphasis
Response Generalization
Instructional Setting
Instructional Method
Generalization Tactic
Support Strategy
Reinforcement
Generalizing the Skills
In order to help Todd better distinguish rules that could be broken in certain circumstances, Mr. Zamarrón focused on response generalization; he wanted Todd to learn different responses, especially in regard to rules that might change or no longer work in certain situations. He operationally defined a single objective:
- When a parent or teacher tells Todd to break one of 10 pre-taught rules, Todd will follow the adult’s direction and complete the rule-specific task at a later time on 9/10 opportunities.
Choosing an Instructional Setting and Method
Mr. Zamarrón was then ready to determine an instructional setting and method. He considered using role play as he did in the previous lesson, but noted that most of the rules Todd followed involved an interaction between Todd and an adult. Thus, peers would not be necessary to teach the skill. Instead, he decided he would use direct instruction in a 1-1 setting to teach the operationally-defined objective.
- Instructional Setting: 1-1
- Instructional Method: Direct instruction
Choosing a Generalization Tactic and Support Strategy
With his setting and instructional method in mind, Mr. Zamarrón began contemplating a generalization tactic and support strategy. During VOISS training, Mr. Zamarrón learned that teaching multiple examples was particularly effective with response generalization, and therefore he chose this method as one of the generalization tactics. Because Mr. Zamarrón wanted Todd to break rules when a trusted adult (e.g., a teacher or a parent) directed him, he decided it made sense to train teachers to prompt and reinforce the skill with Todd’s token reinforcement system.
- Generalization Tactic: Teach multiple examples, train others to prompt and reinforce
- Support Strategy: Reinforcement
Lesson Implementation
Mr. Zamarrón’s Lesson on “Knowing When a Rule Doesn’t Work and Knowing When to Change Strategies”
Preparing the and Carrying Out the Direct Instruction Lesson
Mr. Zamarrón prepared for the lesson by identifying 20 rules Todd followed strictly. He wrote each of these rules on a notecard. Ten of these rules would be unethical or unsafe to break (e.g., purchasing items instead of stealing them; walking on the sidewalk instead of the road). The remaining 10 rules related to academic or organizational tasks and would need to be broken in certain situations. On each card, Mr. Zamarrón wrote down a specific situation which may or may not necessitate breaking a rule.
With 20 rules in mind, Mr. Zamarrón began his 1-1 direct instruction lesson. He reminded Todd that certain rules are important to follow all the time, but other rules can be broken in emergency or unusual situations. He told Todd that it’s sometimes difficult to determine what situations allow for rules to be broken, and that he could turn to his parents or teachers to know when it’s okay to break a rule.
Mr. Zamarrón then selected three cards with acceptable rules to break and two cards with rules that were unacceptable to break. First, he read the rule and then he read the situation. He explained why the rule should be broken or not, and why the specific situation would make breaking the rule acceptable or unacceptable. For example, on one card he wrote, “Only cross the street when the walk sign is on” as the rule, and shared the following situation: “I’m really excited to go home and play Mario Kart.” He explained that crossing the street when the walk sign is on is important for safety and would help keep Todd safe from cars. Excitement for playing Mario Kart was not an emergency situation, and only very extreme emergency situations would make crossing the street without a walk sign okay.
Mr. Zamarrón then read a card with “Clean up my lunch tray after eating” as the rule, and “A friend has fallen and is bleeding” as the situation. He told Todd that cleaning up his tray is a rule designed to keep the cafeteria clean, but cleaning up his tray immediately after eating doesn’t keep him safe. He told Todd it’s more important to help his friend get to the nurse or for him to go to the office and ask for help than it is to clean up his tray. Finally, he reminded Todd that sometimes it’s hard to tell if a situation necessitates rule-breaking, and he should know it’s okay to break a rule if a teacher or parent tells him to.
Next, Mr. Zamarrón and Todd read through 10 rule cards together. He helped Todd evaluate the purpose of the rule and the seriousness of the situation and consider if breaking the rule is appropriate. Finally, Todd read the remaining rule cards alone. He explained the purpose of the rule and why or why not the situation would make breaking the rule acceptable or unacceptable. Mr. Zamarrón provided immediate reinforcing and corrective feedback.
Recruiting Staff Support
After the lesson, Mr. Zamarrón scheduled a brief meeting with each of Todd’s teachers to train them to prompt and reinforce the targeted skills. He explained what Todd had been taught, and identified potential situations that might occur at school which would align with Todd’s target objectives. He also explained Todd’s reinforcement system and asked them to provide a token after the rule-breaking situation. For example, if there was a fire drill and the teachers asked Todd to stop working on an assignment, they would give him a token when he returned to his desk to complete the assignment if he had been able to successfully step away from his work when asked.
NATIONAL AND STATE STANDARDS BENCHMARKS AND INDICATORS
CTPS.7 KNOWS WHEN TO CHANGE STRATEGIES
COLLABORATIVE FOR ACADEMIC, SOCIAL AND EMOTIONAL LEARNING (CASEL) STANDARDS
- Responsible Decision Making
KANSAS SOCIAL EMOTIONAL CHARACTER DEVELOPMENT (KSECD) STANDARDS
Character Development
- Responsible Decision Making and Problem Solving
- A. Develop, implement, and model responsible decision making skills. 1. Consider multiple factors in decision-making including ethical and safety factors, personal and community responsibilites, and short-term and long-term goals.
- 6-8 (11-13) a. Manage safe and unsafe situations.
- A. Develop, implement, and model responsible decision making skills. 1. Consider multiple factors in decision-making including ethical and safety factors, personal and community responsibilites, and short-term and long-term goals.
CTPS.8 KNOWS WHEN A RULE DOESN'T WORK
COLLABORATIVE FOR ACADEMIC, SOCIAL AND EMOTIONAL LEARNING (CASEL) STANDARDS
- Responsible Decision Making
KANSAS SOCIAL EMOTIONAL CHARACTER DEVELOPMENT (KSECD) STANDARDS
Character Development
- Core Principles
- A. Recognize, select, and ascribe to a set of core ethical and performance principles as a foundation of good character and be able to define character comprehensively to include thinking, feeling, and doing.
- 6-8 (11-13) 2. Illustrate and discuss personal core principles in the context of relationships and of classroom work.
- B. Develop, implement, promote, and model core ethical and perfomance principles.
- 6-8 (11-13) 1. Analyze community needs in the larger community, analyze effects on the community, design positive, responsible action, and reflect on personal involvement.
- 2. Develop ethical reasoning through discussions of ethical issues in content areas.
- A. Recognize, select, and ascribe to a set of core ethical and performance principles as a foundation of good character and be able to define character comprehensively to include thinking, feeling, and doing.