VOISS Connection
Mr. Zamarrón created a lesson to help Todd practice the skill of handling annoyance (Critical Thinking & Problem Solving Skill 13).
VOISS Advisor Lesson Plan Outline
Critical Thinking & Problem Solving Skill 13: Handles Annoyance
Define the social skill to be demonstrated in observable and measurable terms. This should be the skill you want the student to use when the situation / opportunity naturally occurs.
When a peer is engaging in a behavior that Todd dislikes or finds annoying, Todd will walk away from the peer and join another activity, or he will ask the peer, “Can you please stop [specific behavior]?” without screaming at the peer on 9/10 opportunities.
If Todd asks a peer to discontinue a specific behavior and the peer continues engaging in the specific behavior, Todd will walk away from the peer without screaming at them on 9/10 opportunities.
Generalization Emphasis
Setting Generalization
Instructional Setting
Instructional Method
Generalization Tactic
Support Strategy
Generalizing the Skills
Mr. Zamarrón knew that Todd often became annoyed during his lunch period and before and after school as he congregated with students in the cafeteria. Mr. Zamarrón wanted to make sure Todd handled annoyance appropriately in these settings. He decided to focus on setting generalization, and operationally defined two objectives to measure the efficacy of his instruction:
- When a peer is engaging in a behavior that Todd dislikes or finds annoying, Todd will walk away from the peer and join another activity, or he will ask the peer, “Can you please stop [specific behavior]?” without screaming at the peer on 9/10 opportunities.
- If Todd asks a peer to discontinue a specific behavior and the peer continues engaging in the specific behavior, Todd will walk away from the peer without screaming at them on 9/10 opportunities.
Choosing an Instructional Setting and Method
Mr. Zamarrón then selected an instructional setting and method. Because Todd consistently became annoyed with peers and not adults, he decided role play with peers would be a good way to practice handling annoyance appropriately. Additionally, Mr. Zamarrón decided this instruction would be best in a small group setting, which would replicate the small groups in which students congregated at lunch and before and after school.
- Instructional Setting: Small Group
- Instructional Method: Role Play
Choosing a Generalization Tactic and Support Strategy
Next, Mr. Zamarrón determined a generalization tactic and support strategy. He considered training support staff to prompt and reinforce the targeted skills, but knew the limited adult supervision during the targeted activities would make adult prompting difficult. He decided the best way to promote generalization would be to teach multiple examples.
With limited adult supervision, Mr. Zamarrón considered the naturally-occurring supports available. Accordingly, he decided he would coach a select group of peers to be peer coaches; their role would be to prompt Todd to engage in the target behavior. This would reduce the need for artificial or awkward adult support.
- Generalization Tactic: Teach multiple examples
- Support Strategy: Peer Coaching
Lesson Implementation
Mr. Zamarrón’s Lesson on “Handling Annoyance”
Recruiting Peer Support
Before the lesson, Mr. Zamarrón met with a small group of four peers from Todd’s lunch bunch. He selected these peers because they were generally well-behaved and he noticed Todd appeared to enjoy spending time with them. He explained what Todd was learning and asked the peers if they would be willing to help teach him by acting as peer coaches. Mr. Zamarrón told the peers that Todd was working on asking people to stop and/or leaving an activity instead of yelling at others when he was annoyed. He told them that Todd might need some help leaving an activity when a peer annoyed him, and he taught the peers to prompt Todd to leave the area with them. They practiced saying things like, “Hey Todd, let’s go see what [another peer’s name] is doing” or asking Todd to engage in a different activity. The peers practiced this skill in mini role play scenarios.
Preparing the Role Play
Mr. Zamarrón prepared for the role play by writing 12 short scripts to teach multiple examples of ways in which Todd might handle annoyance. Each script focused on one of three situations. Four scripts depicted situations where a peer annoyed Todd and Todd left right away. In four other scripts, Todd nicely asked the peer to stop engaging in an annoying behavior, and the peer stopped right away. The final four scripts depicted situations where a peer did not stop an annoying behavior after Todd asked. In these scripts, Todd walked away from the peer when they continued the behavior.
Within the small group setting, Mr. Zamarrón first picked one of each type of script and Todd watched while the peers rehearsed. He had Todd wait, and told him when it would be appropriate to leave the area or nicely ask the peer to stop. After watching his peers rehearse three scenarios, Todd participated in the nine remaining role plays. After the role play, Mr. Zamarrón prompted the students to think of other, similar situations that might occur. They talked about how they should react if someone is annoying them, and what to do if the person persists.
National and State Standards Benchmarks and Indicators
CTPS.13 Handles Annoyance
Collaborative for Academic, Social and Emotional Learning (CASEL) Standards
- Responsible Decision Making
Kansas Social Emotional Character Development (KSECD) Standards
Character Development
- Responsible Decision Making and Problem Solving
- B. Develop, implement, and model effective problem solving skills.
- 6-8 (11-13) 1. Identify specific feelings about the problem and apply appropriate self-regulation skills.
- B. Develop, implement, and model effective problem solving skills.